Estimate Individual Coverage HRA costs, compare to group health insurance, and check ACA affordability — by state and employee class
Allowances are linearly interpolated between youngest and oldest. Max ratio: 3:1.
Loading...
| Feature | ICHRA | Group Plan | QSEHRA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Employer size | Any size | Any size | <50 employees only |
| Max allowance | No cap | N/A (premium-based) | $6,350/ind, $12,800/fam (2026) |
| Employee classes | 11 classes allowed | Same plan for all | Same for all (age/family only) |
| Employee choice | Any ACA plan | Employer-chosen plan | Any ACA plan |
| Tax treatment | Tax-free reimbursement | Pre-tax premium | Tax-free reimbursement |
| ACA compliance | Satisfies employer mandate | Satisfies employer mandate | Small employer only |
| Cost predictability | 100% fixed budget | Annual renewal risk | 100% fixed budget |
| Admin complexity | Moderate (TPA needed) | Low-moderate | Low |
What is an ICHRA?
An Individual Coverage Health Reimbursement Arrangement (ICHRA) is an employer-funded, tax-advantaged benefit that reimburses employees for individual health insurance premiums and medical expenses. Established by IRS Final Rules published June 20, 2019 (84 FR 28888), ICHRAs allow employers of any size to provide a defined contribution toward employees' individual market coverage.
ICHRA Allowance Calculation:
Base allowance is the monthly amount you set. If age variation is enabled, allowances are linearly interpolated from youngest (age 21) to oldest (age 64) using the formula: allowance = young + (age - 21) / (43) * (old - young). The IRS permits up to a 3:1 oldest-to-youngest ratio, mirroring the ACA age curve.
Family Size Multipliers:
When family variation is enabled, the base allowance is multiplied by the selected factor for each tier. The calculator uses a blended rate assuming 60% single / 25% EE+spouse / 15% family unless overridden by class data.
Marketplace Premium Estimates:
Self-only silver plan premiums are estimated using CMS 2026 marketplace data: national baseline of $496/month for a 40-year-old, adjusted by state cost index and CMS federal age curve factors.
ACA Affordability Test:
Under IRS Notice 2024-55, an ICHRA is "affordable" if the employee's required contribution for the lowest-cost silver plan (self-only) minus the ICHRA allowance is no more than 9.02% of household income divided by 12. If unaffordable, employees may opt out and claim premium tax credits instead.
Group Plan Comparison:
Group plan costs use the entered PEPM multiplied by employer contribution percentage. ICHRA costs are fully predictable since the employer sets a fixed allowance. Group premiums are subject to annual renewal increases (national average: 7-10% per year).
Data Sources: IRS Final Rules on ICHRAs (84 FR 28888, 2019), IRS Notice 2024-55 (ICHRA affordability), CMS 2026 Marketplace Premium Data, KFF 2025 Employer Health Benefits Survey, HRA Council 2025 Benchmark Report.
Get a personalized ICHRA implementation plan with employee class strategy, allowance optimization, and ACA compliance review — from a benefits advisor.
The Individual Coverage HRA (ICHRA) modeling applies the regulatory framework established in the June 2019 final rule (84 FR 28888) and subsequent IRS guidance. Allowance optimization considers the applicable employee classes permitted under the regulations and the interaction between ICHRA allowances and premium tax credit eligibility on the individual market exchange.
Cost projections compare the employer's current group plan costs against the sum of ICHRA allowances plus administrative platform fees. The affordability determination uses the required ICHRA affordability test, which compares the employee's self-only cost for the lowest-cost silver plan in their rating area minus the ICHRA allowance against the ACA affordability percentage threshold.
ICHRA arrangements offer maximum flexibility for geographically distributed workforces and employers seeking to move from a defined-benefit to defined-contribution health benefit model. The break-even analysis shown accounts for both direct cost savings and the administrative simplification of eliminating group plan management.
This analysis draws from the following primary data sources:
Methodology note: All projections use a composite rate approach with demographic adjustment factors. State-specific regulatory constraints are reflected in baseline rate assumptions. Results are directional estimates intended for planning purposes.